PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 22.07% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 9.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.91%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.


SCHA

1D
2.21%
1M
-1.34%
6M
15.12%
YTD
22.07%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.91%
ALL TIME*
12.59%

SPYV

1D
0.36%
1M
1.88%
6M
8.74%
YTD
9.57%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
11.67%
ALL TIME*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
22.07%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
9.57%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and SPYV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.83

The correlation between SCHA and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHA vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
SPYV

Technology

22.4%
21.7%

Healthcare

15.7%
12.2%

Financial Services

15.6%
15.1%

Industrials

14.7%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.6%

Real Estate

6.2%
3.3%

Energy

4.7%
6.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
8.8%

Utilities

2.3%
4.5%

Technology

SCHA
22.4%
SPYV
21.7%

Healthcare

SCHA
15.7%
SPYV
12.2%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.6%
SPYV
15.1%

Industrials

SCHA
14.7%
SPYV
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.5%
SPYV
10.6%

Real Estate

SCHA
6.2%
SPYV
3.3%

Energy

SCHA
4.7%
SPYV
6.6%

Basic Materials

SCHA
3.9%
SPYV
3.3%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.5%
SPYV
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.3%
SPYV
8.8%

Utilities

SCHA
2.3%
SPYV
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHASPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.05

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

11.60

+1.00

SCHA vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHASPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-58.45%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-6.22%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-17.54%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-17.89%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-36.89%

-5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-0.80%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-8.68%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.63%

+1.15%

Volatility

SCHA vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.12%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHASPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

2.12%

+3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

7.28%

+7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.05%

9.91%

+9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

14.30%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

16.88%

+5.87%

SCHA vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHA and SPYV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHA vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPYV's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.03%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.69%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHA and SPYV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to SPYV (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.67% vs 10.91% for SCHA. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA and SPYV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.03% for SCHA.

SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer