SCHA vs. SMLV
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 10.91%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for SMLV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SMLV.
Performance
SCHA vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHA having a 22.07% return and SMLV slightly higher at 22.65%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 10.91% annualized return and SMLV not far behind at 10.46%.
SCHA
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
SMLV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
SCHA vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.07% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 22.65% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and SMLV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SCHA and SMLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHA vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
SMLV
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
SCHA
SMLV
Healthcare
SCHA
SMLV
Financial Services
SCHA
SMLV
Industrials
SCHA
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
SMLV
Real Estate
SCHA
SMLV
Energy
SCHA
SMLV
Basic Materials
SCHA
SMLV
Communication Services
SCHA
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
SMLV
Utilities
SCHA
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
SMLV
SCHA vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 3.96 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.60 | 11.15 | +1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, roughly equal to the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -42.45% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -7.34% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -20.40% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -20.40% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -42.45% | +0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -1.26% | -2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -5.41% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.60% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) at 3.69%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 3.69% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 10.08% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.05% | 15.43% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 18.22% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 20.90% | +1.85% |
SCHA vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SMLV's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.22% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and SMLV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to SMLV (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 10.91% vs 10.46% for SMLV. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.03% for SCHA.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer