SCHA vs. QDTE
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. SCHA is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHA returned 36.31% vs 34.41% for QDTE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
SCHA vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 12.44% return.
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 36.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
QDTE
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 17.78% | 11.60% | 8.86% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.44% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and QDTE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SCHA and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
QDTE
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SCHA
QDTE
-
Industrials
SCHA
QDTE
-
Financial Services
SCHA
QDTE
Healthcare
SCHA
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
QDTE
-
Real Estate
SCHA
QDTE
-
Energy
SCHA
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
SCHA
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
QDTE
-
Utilities
SCHA
QDTE
-
Communication Services
SCHA
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
QDTE
SCHA vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.39 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.05 | 13.52 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.20 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.17 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -22.86% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -10.20% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -3.70% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -3.14% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.55% | +0.04% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) is 5.79%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that SCHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 6.57% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 12.26% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 15.71% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 18.72% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 18.72% | +4.02% |
SCHA vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHA vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than QDTE's 44.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.14% | 49.49% | 32.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and QDTE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to SCHA (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, SCHA leads with 36.31% vs 34.41% for QDTE. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 36.31% return vs 34.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.14%, compared with 1.02% for SCHA.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer