PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's 14.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 11.13% annualized return and IVOO not far ahead at 11.22%.


SCHA

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.77%
YTD
19.79%
6M
19.32%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.13%

IVOO

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.90%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.37%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
19.79%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.13%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and IVOO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.96

The correlation between SCHA and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
IVOO

Technology

23.3%
15.7%

Financial Services

15.7%
14.4%

Industrials

15.4%
25.1%

Healthcare

13.5%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.7%

Real Estate

6.0%
7.5%

Energy

5.5%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
1.0%

Utilities

2.3%
3.1%

Technology

SCHA
23.3%
IVOO
15.7%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.7%
IVOO
14.4%

Industrials

SCHA
15.4%
IVOO
25.1%

Healthcare

SCHA
13.5%
IVOO
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.0%
IVOO
10.7%

Real Estate

SCHA
6.0%
IVOO
7.5%

Energy

SCHA
5.5%
IVOO
5.5%

Basic Materials

SCHA
4.2%
IVOO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.6%
IVOO
3.8%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.4%
IVOO
1.0%

Utilities

SCHA
2.3%
IVOO
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHAIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

2.91

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.66

10.61

+5.05

SCHA vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHAIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.65

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.42

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.62

-0.04

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHAIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-42.33%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-8.81%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-24.22%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-24.22%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-42.33%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.02%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-5.27%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.41%

+0.17%

Volatility

SCHA vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 4.39%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHAIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

4.39%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

11.36%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

15.56%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

19.72%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

21.19%

+1.52%

SCHA vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHA vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.00%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCHA and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to IVOO (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 11.22% vs 11.13% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 11.22% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOO.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.

SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.10% for IVOO.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer