SCGVX vs. FGIAX
SCGVX (Sands Capital Global Growth Fund) and FGIAX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - SCGVX is a Global Equities fund managed by Sands Capital, while FGIAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. Over the past 10 years, SCGVX returned 9.66%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for FGIAX. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SCGVX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FGIAX.
Performance
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCGVX achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCGVX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.66%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.
SCGVX
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- -1.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.38%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCGVX Sands Capital Global Growth Fund | -1.81% | 10.68% | 15.64% | 31.49% | -43.49% | 9.56% | 49.33% | 29.89% | -2.97% | 38.38% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 11.78% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCGVX and FGIAX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCGVX and FGIAX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCGVX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
SCGVX
FGIAX
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCGVX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.27 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.68 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 8.31 | -8.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCGVX drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGVX and FGIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCGVX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.96% | -49.35% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -6.04% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.07% | -9.68% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -21.08% | -32.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.96% | -38.02% | -15.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.06% | -2.72% | -14.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -7.13% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | 1.94% | +5.48% |
Volatility
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 3.34%. This indicates that SCGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCGVX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 3.34% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.10% | 9.07% | +8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.11% | 10.70% | +9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 13.25% | +12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 15.16% | +7.94% |
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCGVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCGVX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
SCGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.43%, more than FGIAX's 14.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 14.27% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
SCGVX Sands Capital Global Growth Fund | 47.43% | 46.57% | 9.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 3.34% | 5.97% | 9.05% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCGVX and FGIAX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCGVX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to FGIAX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCGVX dropped -53.96% vs FGIAX's -49.35%.
FGIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCGVX and FGIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer