SCA vs. PLTM
SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SCA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). SCA is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
SCA vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -39.78%
- YTD
- -22.42%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.37M | $2.19M | $3.51M | |
| $4.59K | $7.11K | $8.84K |
SCA vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | -6.10% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -18.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCA and PLTM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCA vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
SCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM
SCA vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCA | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCA vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -44.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCA | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -44.07% | +16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -42.69% | +31.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -18.89% | +5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.89% | — |
Volatility
SCA vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCA | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.79% | 50.89% | +11.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 33.15% | +29.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 31.16% | +31.63% |
SCA vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCA vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% |
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | 7.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCA and PLTM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SCA.
SCA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
SCA is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SCA and 0.50% for PLTM.
Find the right allocation for SCA and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer