SCA vs. MRNY
SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SCA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.
Performance
SCA vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 66.40%
- 1Y
- 34.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.69M | $4.30M | $3.33M | |
| $4.59K | $7.11K | $8.84K |
SCA vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | -6.10% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 14.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCA and MRNY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCA vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
SCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MRNY
SCA vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCA | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCA vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCA | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -82.15% | +54.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -64.97% | +54.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -53.07% | +40.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.69% | — |
Volatility
SCA vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCA | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.79% | 53.07% | +9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 51.48% | +11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 51.48% | +11.31% |
SCA vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCA vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, less than MRNY's 94.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 94.97% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | 7.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCA and MRNY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MRNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MRNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SCA.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 94.97%, compared with 7.36% for SCA.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SCA and 0.99% for MRNY.
Find the right allocation for SCA and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer