SBU vs. GUSH
SBU (Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SBU is actively managed, while GUSH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SBU charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
SBU vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBU achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 73.60% return.
SBU
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- -19.62%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- 73.60%
- 6M
- 49.22%
- 1Y
- 84.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- -36.93%
SBU vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 17.25% | -0.84% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 73.60% | -7.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBU and GUSH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBU vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
SBU
GUSH
SBU vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBU | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | -0.44 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
SBU vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBU | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -99.98% | +71.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.93% | -99.79% | +76.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -92.92% | +86.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.58% | — |
Volatility
SBU vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBU | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.79% | 55.49% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.79% | 68.21% | -8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.79% | 93.70% | -33.91% |
SBU vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBU vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
SBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.44% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBU and GUSH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for SBU.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBU and 1.17% for GUSH.
Find the right allocation for SBU and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer