PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBU vs. XXXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBU vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBU achieves a 31.44% return, which is significantly higher than XXXX's 20.71% return.


SBU

1D
-1.42%
1M
-6.65%
YTD
31.44%
6M
25.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XXXX

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
20.71%
6M
17.73%
1Y
77.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBU vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SBU
Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF
31.44%-6.03%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
20.71%2.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SBU and XXXX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBU vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBU vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBUXXXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

SBU vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBU vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and XXXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBUXXXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-62.27%

+34.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.61%

-9.34%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-11.55%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.97%

Volatility

SBU vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBUXXXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.40%

49.23%

+10.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.40%

61.12%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.40%

61.12%

-1.72%

SBU vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBU vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBU nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SBU and XXXX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

SBU and XXXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBU and 2.95% for XXXX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBU and XXXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer