SBTU vs. SPUU
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SBTU is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
SBTU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -72.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 18.22% return.
SBTU
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -79.40%
- YTD
- -72.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- YTD
- 18.22%
- 1Y
- 38.38%
- 3Y*
- 32.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.84%
SBTU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -72.45% | -67.09% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 18.22% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and SPUU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
SBTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUU
SBTU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBTU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -94.22%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.22% | -59.35% | -34.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.01% | -2.59% | -88.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.86% | -9.45% | -62.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.38% | — |
Volatility
SBTU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 159.58% | 25.27% | +134.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 159.58% | 33.69% | +125.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.58% | 35.75% | +123.83% |
SBTU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBTU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
SBTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.33% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and SPUU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for SBTU.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.60% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer