SBIO vs. RIGS
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS).
SBIO and RIGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SBIO is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 2014. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
SBIO vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBIO vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 3.20% | 55.07% | 3.81% | 8.68% | -28.08% | -17.55% | 21.17% | 50.30% | -11.81% | 45.67% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIO achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SBIO has outperformed RIGS with an annualized return of 9.75%, while RIGS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.
SBIO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 36.23%
- 1Y
- 95.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBIO vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBIO vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
SBIO
RIGS
SBIO vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIO | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.92 | 0.37 | +2.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.57 | 0.60 | +2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.08 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | 0.74 | +4.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.94 | 1.87 | +18.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIO | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 0.37 | +2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.29 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.45 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIO and RIGS is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SBIO vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
SBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 2.79% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
SBIO vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIO drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIO and RIGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIO | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.06% | -15.31% | -47.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.08% | -5.18% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -9.03% | -44.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.06% | -15.31% | -47.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.79% | -2.15% | -11.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.70% | -1.60% | -27.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 2.05% | +2.23% |
Volatility
SBIO vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) has a higher volatility of 12.61% compared to RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) at 2.20%. This indicates that SBIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBIO | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.61% | 2.20% | +10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.09% | 6.17% | +15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.43% | 10.15% | +23.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.55% | 7.47% | +26.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 7.74% | +25.60% |