SBIL vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. SBIL is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

SBIL vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

SBIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 27.76%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIL vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	1.51%	1.88%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and ISCMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

SBIL vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 82
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIL vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBIL	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	14.15	0.45	+13.69

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIL	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-25.42%	+25.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.26%	+5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-13.44%	+13.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBIL	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28%	18.53%	-18.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.28%	14.38%	-14.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.28%	14.38%	-14.10%

SBIL vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SBIL vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	3.26%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIL and ISCMF in my portfolio?

SBIL and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIL or ISCMF?

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIL or ISCMF?

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIL or ISCMF?

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between SBIL and ISCMF?

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.19% for ISCMF.