SBIL vs. BCI
SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. SBIL is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
SBIL vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 17.72% return.
SBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SBIL vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF | 1.87% | 1.88% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 17.72% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIL and BCI is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIL vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
SBIL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCI
SBIL vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBIL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBIL vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -32.69% | +32.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.27% | +11.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -11.99% | +11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility
SBIL vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26% | 17.24% | -16.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.26% | 16.81% | -16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.26% | 15.66% | -15.40% |
SBIL vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SBIL vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than BCI's 14.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.01% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF | 3.55% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIL and BCI have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for BCI.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 3.55% for SBIL.
SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.26% for BCI.
Find the right allocation for SBIL and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer