PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIL vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIL vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's -0.43% return.


SBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.84%

AGGH

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.44%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.05M$4.71M$3.88M
$31.14M$24.02M$26.67M

SBIL vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SBIL
Simplify Government Money Market ETF
2.09%1.88%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.43%6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and AGGH is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIL vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBIL
SBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBIL vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBILAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+14.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+57.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

12.98

1.16

+11.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

154.53

1.71

+152.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

868.15

4.25

+863.90

SBIL vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIL Sharpe Ratio is 15.08, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIL and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum AGGH drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBILAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-13.26%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-2.83%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.47%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-4.34%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.14%

-1.14%

Volatility

SBIL vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) is 0.05%, while Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that SBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBILAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

1.22%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.18%

3.50%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26%

5.43%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

8.35%

-8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

8.35%

-8.09%

SBIL vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBIL vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than AGGH's 7.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.59%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
SBIL
Simplify Government Money Market ETF
3.87%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIL and AGGH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGGH has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to SBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIL dropped -0.03% vs AGGH's -13.26%.

On 1-year performance, SBIL leads with 3.85% vs 3.43% for AGGH. On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIL has performed better with a 3.85% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.

AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.59%, compared with 3.87% for SBIL.

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.33% for AGGH.

SBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.08 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIL and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer