PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFCX vs. RSNRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFCX achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than RSNRX's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFCX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.


SBFCX

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.95%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.98%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
6.69%

RSNRX

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.52%
6M
13.43%
YTD
28.25%
1Y
73.87%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
29.40%
10Y*
12.50%
ALL TIME*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.98%5.07%9.48%7.98%-11.63%10.90%11.35%19.84%-0.44%18.47%
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
28.25%69.60%15.94%-8.64%35.02%83.01%27.35%-24.49%-45.81%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFCX and RSNRX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between SBFCX and RSNRX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFCX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBFCX
SBFCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SBFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

RSNRX
RSNRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
RSNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RSNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFCXRSNRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.52

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

6.30

-5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.28

17.27

-12.99

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the RSNRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFCX and RSNRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFCX drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFCX and RSNRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFCXRSNRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-89.73%

+41.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-11.65%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.68%

-25.09%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-25.44%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.79%

-84.27%

+60.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-7.57%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-25.82%

+19.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

4.24%

-2.99%

Volatility

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) is 1.53%, while Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that SBFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFCXRSNRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

4.41%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

16.96%

-11.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

23.17%

-16.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.22%

24.56%

-16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

31.32%

-21.80%

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBFCX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison

SBFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than RSNRX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
3.41%4.38%1.65%2.36%0.78%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.12%4.35%1.87%2.84%2.19%9.86%4.88%4.94%5.66%3.13%1.38%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFCX and RSNRX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSNRX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to SBFCX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFCX dropped -47.88% vs RSNRX's -89.73%.

RSNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFCX and RSNRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer