PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFCX vs. FACVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFCX achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than FACVX's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFCX has underperformed FACVX with an annualized return of 7.91%, while FACVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.


SBFCX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.09%
YTD
5.81%
6M
5.34%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
7.91%

FACVX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.90%
YTD
23.62%
6M
21.73%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
5.81%5.07%9.48%7.98%-11.63%10.90%11.35%19.84%-0.44%18.47%
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
23.62%17.95%7.92%11.06%-15.59%9.63%42.09%28.21%-1.59%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFCX and FACVX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between SBFCX and FACVX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFCX vs. FACVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBFCX
SBFCX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SBFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FACVX
FACVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FACVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FACVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFCXFACVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

5.79

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

20.92

-10.83

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the FACVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFCX and FACVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFCX drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, which is greater than FACVX's maximum drawdown of -25.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFCX and FACVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFCXFACVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-25.09%

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-7.15%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.68%

-18.91%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-24.32%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.79%

-25.09%

+1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.30%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-5.75%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.97%

-0.85%

Volatility

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) is 2.48%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that SBFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFCXFACVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

6.40%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.08%

12.88%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.43%

15.84%

-9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.23%

13.69%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.57%

13.76%

-4.19%

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FACVX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBFCX vs. FACVX - Dividend Comparison

SBFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than FACVX's 8.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
8.75%11.18%1.85%1.86%3.48%20.42%10.56%3.04%9.55%3.89%4.62%10.02%
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.06%4.35%1.87%2.84%2.19%9.86%4.88%4.94%5.66%3.13%1.38%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFCX and FACVX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FACVX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to SBFCX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFCX dropped -47.88% vs FACVX's -25.09%.

FACVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFCX and FACVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer