SAWG vs. GQGU
SAWG (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
SAWG vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAWG achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.60% return.
SAWG
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAWG vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF | 8.93% | 8.24% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAWG and GQGU is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAWG vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
SAWG
GQGU
SAWG vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAWG | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAWG | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SAWG vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAWG drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWG and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAWG | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.68% | -6.65% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -4.66% | +4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -2.54% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | — | — |
Volatility
SAWG vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAWG | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 10.14% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 10.14% | +6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 10.14% | +6.07% |
SAWG vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SAWG and GQGU have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
SAWG vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
SAWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAWG and GQGU have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAWG and GQGU have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.25% for SAWG.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and GQG Partners.
Find the right allocation for SAWG and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer