PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAWG vs. TIIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAWG vs. TIIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWG achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than TIIV's 14.51% return.


SAWG

1D
0.52%
1M
0.10%
6M
8.55%
YTD
8.37%
1Y
17.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.12%

TIIV

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.74%
6M
7.67%
YTD
14.51%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.88K$32.12K$31.74K
$20.24K$14.96K$74.75K

SAWG vs. TIIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAWG and TIIV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.65

The correlation between SAWG and TIIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAWG vs. TIIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAWG
SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

TIIV
TIIV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TIIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TIIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAWG vs. TIIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAWGTIIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.14

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

10.95

-5.31

SAWG vs. TIIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the TIIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWG and TIIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAWG vs. TIIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWG drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, which is greater than TIIV's maximum drawdown of -9.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWG and TIIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAWGTIIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-9.68%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-9.68%

-1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.12%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-1.78%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.77%

+0.03%

Volatility

SAWG vs. TIIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is 3.28%, while AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that SAWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAWGTIIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.91%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

12.07%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

14.50%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

14.52%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

14.52%

+1.53%

SAWG vs. TIIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TIIV's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAWG vs. TIIV - Dividend Comparison

SAWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than TIIV's 3.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAWG and TIIV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIIV has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to SAWG (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAWG dropped -18.68% vs TIIV's -9.68%.

On 1-year performance, TIIV leads with 31.35% vs 17.21% for SAWG. On fees, SAWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SAWG has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIIV has performed better with a 31.35% return vs 17.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SAWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.25% for SAWG.

SAWG is categorized as Quality Factor, while TIIV is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SAWG and 0.54% for TIIV.

TIIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAWG and TIIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer