PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAWG vs. SAWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAWG vs. SAWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWG achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than SAWS's 7.63% return.


SAWG

1D
0.31%
1M
5.42%
YTD
1.17%
6M
3.60%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SAWS

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.88%
YTD
7.63%
6M
9.50%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWG vs. SAWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAWG and SAWS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.72

The correlation between SAWG and SAWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAWG vs. SAWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWG
SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SAWS
SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWG vs. SAWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAWGSAWSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.40

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.09

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.37

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.56

7.98

+0.58

SAWG vs. SAWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWG Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the SAWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWG and SAWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAWGSAWSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.40

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.52

+0.13

Drawdowns

SAWG vs. SAWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWG drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, smaller than the maximum SAWS drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWG and SAWS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAWGSAWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-22.04%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-10.23%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-1.67%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-5.89%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.04%

-0.29%

Volatility

SAWG vs. SAWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is 5.62%, while AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that SAWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAWGSAWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

7.20%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

13.68%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

18.21%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

21.26%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

21.26%

-4.77%

SAWG vs. SAWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SAWS's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAWG vs. SAWS - Dividend Comparison

SAWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than SAWS's 0.02% yield.