SAWG vs. LODI
SAWG (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF) and LODI (AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAWG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while LODI is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SAWG returned 22.19% vs 5.71% for LODI. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SAWG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LODI.
Performance
SAWG vs. LODI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAWG achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than LODI's 1.92% return.
SAWG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LODI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAWG vs. LODI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF | 8.74% | 11.30% | -2.39% |
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 1.92% | 6.04% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAWG and LODI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAWG vs. LODI — Risk / Return Rank
SAWG
LODI
SAWG vs. LODI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAWG | LODI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 2.36 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 3.53 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.58 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 8.11 | -6.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 20.96 | -12.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAWG | LODI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.36 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 2.39 | -1.50 |
Drawdowns
SAWG vs. LODI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAWG drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, which is greater than LODI's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWG and LODI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAWG | LODI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.68% | -1.01% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -0.75% | -10.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -0.21% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 0.29% | +2.42% |
Volatility
SAWG vs. LODI - Volatility Comparison
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) at 0.33%. This indicates that SAWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LODI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAWG | LODI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 0.33% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 1.24% | +8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 2.45% | +9.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 2.34% | +13.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 2.34% | +13.88% |
SAWG vs. LODI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LODI's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAWG vs. LODI - Dividend Comparison
SAWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than LODI's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 4.96% | 5.11% | 0.38% |
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAWG and LODI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAWG has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to LODI (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAWG dropped -18.68% vs LODI's -1.01%.
On 1-year performance, SAWG leads with 22.19% vs 5.71% for LODI. On fees, LODI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LODI has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SAWG has performed better with a 22.19% return vs 5.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LODI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SAWG.
LODI has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.25% for SAWG.
SAWG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LODI is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SAWG and 0.15% for LODI.
LODI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAWG and LODI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer