SATO vs. XLG
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 21.83%/yr vs 20.00%/yr for XLG. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
SATO vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -13.37% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 2.89% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -13.37%
- 1Y
- -18.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.90%
XLG
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.71K | $38.05K | $74.17K | |
| $61.04M | $60.71M | $102.52M |
SATO vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | -13.37% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -80.20% | -17.33% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 2.89% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 10.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and XLG is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SATO and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
XLG
SATO vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SATO | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.10 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 3.41 | -4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SATO vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -52.39% | -35.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -12.41% | -41.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -20.70% | -32.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.92% | -5.74% | -41.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -7.62% | -43.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.62% | 3.98% | +29.64% |
Volatility
SATO vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.03%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 5.03% | +11.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.43% | 11.54% | +27.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.26% | 14.75% | +38.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.98% | 18.89% | +44.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.98% | 18.92% | +44.06% |
SATO vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.74% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and XLG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SATO has higher volatility (16.55%) compared to XLG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 21.83% vs 20.00% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 21.83% return vs 20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.74%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XLG is S&P 500. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer