SATO vs. XLG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 20.64%/yr vs 20.97%/yr for XLG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

SATO vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -11.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 3.75% return.

SATO

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -10.88%
• 6M: -23.63%
• YTD: -11.75%
• 1Y: -22.30%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 2.98%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 1Y: 17.41%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 16.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	-11.75%	2.26%	55.25%	266.77%	-80.20%	-17.33%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	3.75%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	10.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and XLG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021	0.60

The correlation between SATO and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SATO vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO

SATO Risk / Return Rank: 6
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 40
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SATO	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	1.24	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	1.75	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.22	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	1.41	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	4.71	-5.41

SATO vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SATO vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SATO	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.00%	-52.39%	-35.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.49%	-12.41%	-41.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.49%	-20.70%	-32.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.92%	-4.94%	-40.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.75%	-7.63%	-43.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.01%	3.71%	+28.30%

Volatility

SATO vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.83%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SATO	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.67%	4.83%	+7.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.10%	11.06%	+27.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.01%	14.13%	+37.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.99%	18.83%	+44.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.99%	18.87%	+44.12%

SATO vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SATO vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	7.60%	9.50%	15.03%	2.21%	8.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.65%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SATO and XLG in my portfolio?

SATO and XLG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SATO or XLG?

SATO has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to XLG (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, SATO or XLG?

On 3-year performance, XLG leads with 20.97% vs 20.64% for SATO. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SATO or XLG?

Over the 3-year period, XLG has performed better with a 20.97% return vs 20.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SATO or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SATO or XLG?

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.

What is the main difference between SATO and XLG?

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XLG is S&P 500. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.