SATO vs. BITO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SATO is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 37.72%/yr vs 18.00%/yr for BITO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.

Performance

SATO vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -29.93% return.

SATO

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: -5.06%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 37.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITO

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -18.05%
• YTD: -29.93%
• 6M: -30.03%
• 1Y: -42.09%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	0.09%	2.26%	55.25%	266.77%	-80.20%	-21.54%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-29.93%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and BITO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021	0.78

The correlation between SATO and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SATO vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO

SATO Risk / Return Rank: 11
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SATO	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	-0.96	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	-1.38	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.85	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	-0.80	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	-1.35	+1.63

SATO vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SATO vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SATO	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.00%	-77.86%	-10.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.49%	-53.10%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.49%	-53.10%	-0.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.67%	-51.67%	+13.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.82%	-36.86%	-13.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.44%	31.28%	-0.84%

Volatility

SATO vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 13.50% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.79%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SATO	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.50%	12.79%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.64%	34.39%	+4.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.11%	44.08%	+8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.17%	55.02%	+8.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.17%	55.02%	+8.15%

SATO vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SATO vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, less than BITO's 71.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	71.07%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%	0.00%	0.00%
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	6.70%	9.50%	15.03%	2.21%	8.97%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SATO and BITO in my portfolio?

SATO and BITO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SATO or BITO?

SATO has higher volatility (13.50%) compared to BITO (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs BITO's -77.86%.

Which ETF is better, SATO or BITO?

On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 37.72% vs 18.00% for BITO. On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 12.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SATO or BITO?

Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 37.72% return vs 18.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SATO or BITO?

SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SATO or BITO?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 71.07%, compared with 6.70% for SATO.

What is the main difference between SATO and BITO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.95% for BITO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.