SATO vs. AMTR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while AMTR is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMTR.

Performance

SATO vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SATO

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: -5.06%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 37.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMTR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	0.09%	2.26%	55.25%	266.77%	-80.20%	-17.33%
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.68%	12.75%	20.41%	-2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and AMTR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021	0.28

Return for Risk

SATO vs. AMTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO

SATO Risk / Return Rank: 11
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

AMTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SATO	AMTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SATO	AMTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.67%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.82%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SATO	AMTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.11%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.17%	—	—

SATO vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SATO vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, while AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	6.70%	9.50%	15.03%	2.21%	8.97%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SATO and AMTR in my portfolio?

SATO and AMTR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SATO or AMTR?

On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SATO or AMTR?

SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SATO or AMTR?

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.

What is the main difference between SATO and AMTR?

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AMTR is MLPs. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.75% for AMTR.