SATO vs. RSP
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 46.97%/yr vs 15.37%/yr for RSP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
SATO vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.12% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
SATO vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 6.41% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -80.20% | -17.39% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.12% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and RSP is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SATO and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
SATO vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SATO
RSP
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SATO
RSP
Technology
SATO
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
SATO
RSP
Communication Services
SATO
RSP
Industrials
SATO
RSP
Utilities
SATO
RSP
Healthcare
SATO
RSP
Basic Materials
SATO
-
RSP
Consumer Defensive
SATO
-
RSP
Energy
SATO
-
RSP
Real Estate
SATO
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
RSP
SATO vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 1.82 | -1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 2.63 | -1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 2.68 | -2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 10.20 | -9.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.82 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.57 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than RSP's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -59.92% | -28.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -7.85% | -45.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -17.81% | -35.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | 0.00% | -34.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -6.65% | -44.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | 2.06% | +27.01% |
Volatility
SATO vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.61%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | 2.61% | +8.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | 8.31% | +30.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.47% | 11.56% | +39.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 16.18% | +47.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 18.36% | +44.93% |
SATO vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than RSP's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.48% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.41% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and RSP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SATO has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to RSP (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 46.97% vs 15.37% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 46.97% return vs 15.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.48% for RSP.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSP is S&P 500. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer