SATO vs. BLOK
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. SATO is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 45.60%/yr vs 51.34%/yr for BLOK. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
SATO vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- -11.57%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 45.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SATO vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 3.47% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -80.20% | -17.39% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -62.36% | -4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and BLOK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SATO and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SATO vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SATO
BLOK
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SATO
BLOK
Technology
SATO
BLOK
Consumer Cyclical
SATO
BLOK
Communication Services
SATO
BLOK
Industrials
SATO
BLOK
Utilities
SATO
BLOK
-
Healthcare
SATO
BLOK
-
Basic Materials
SATO
-
BLOK
-
Consumer Defensive
SATO
-
BLOK
-
Energy
SATO
-
BLOK
-
Real Estate
SATO
-
BLOK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
BLOK
SATO vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 0.81 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 1.30 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.87 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | 1.90 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.81 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.48 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -73.33% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -35.64% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -35.64% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.60% | -10.16% | -26.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -26.08% | -24.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.16% | 16.23% | +12.93% |
Volatility
SATO vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) at 10.59%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 10.59% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.36% | 28.55% | +9.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.53% | 38.29% | +13.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.28% | 42.36% | +20.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.28% | 38.97% | +24.31% |
SATO vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.62% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SATO and BLOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SATO has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to BLOK (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs BLOK's -73.33%.
On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 51.34% vs 45.60% for SATO. On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 51.34% return vs 45.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.71% for BLOK.
BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer