BAH vs. VRSK
BAH (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation) and VRSK (Verisk Analytics, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Consulting Services industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, BAH returned 10.63%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for VRSK. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BAH vs. VRSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -16.10% return, which is significantly lower than VRSK's -12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has outperformed VRSK with an annualized return of 10.63%, while VRSK has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
BAH
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 11.64%
- 6M
- -19.95%
- YTD
- -16.10%
- 1Y
- -34.73%
- 3Y*
- -15.70%
- 5Y*
- -2.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.28%
VRSK
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- 6M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- -12.43%
- 1Y
- -27.68%
- 3Y*
- -4.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $197.35M | $164.53M | $161.00M | |
| $402.10M | $365.13M | $426.60M |
BAH vs. VRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -16.10% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | -1.04% | 24.46% | 60.16% | 20.21% | 7.77% |
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | -12.43% | -18.23% | 16.00% | 36.24% | -22.33% | 10.85% | 39.89% | 37.92% | 13.58% | 18.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAH and VRSK is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BAH and VRSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BAH:
$8.39B
VRSK:
$25.36B
BAH:
$8.47
VRSK:
$6.50
BAH:
8.23
VRSK:
29.99
BAH:
0.24
VRSK:
1.63
BAH:
0.58
VRSK:
8.47
BAH:
$11.09B
VRSK:
$3.14B
BAH:
$4.96B
VRSK:
$2.12B
BAH:
$1.24B
VRSK:
$1.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAH vs. VRSK — Risk / Return Rank
BAH
VRSK
BAH vs. VRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAH | VRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.86 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.70 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.19 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAH vs. VRSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -66.59%, which is greater than VRSK's maximum drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and VRSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAH | VRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.59% | -50.81% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.19% | -42.19% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.59% | -50.81% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.59% | -50.81% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.59% | -50.81% | -15.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -38.72% | -22.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -7.50% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.06% | 26.21% | -1.15% |
Volatility
BAH vs. VRSK - Volatility Comparison
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) at 12.64%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAH | VRSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 12.64% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.52% | 28.86% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.61% | 33.67% | +6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 25.01% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 24.36% | +4.80% |
Dividends
BAH vs. VRSK - Dividend Comparison
BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than VRSK's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 3.27% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 0.98% | 0.80% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.70% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BAH vs. VRSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Verisk Analytics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAH vs. VRSK - Profitability Comparison
BAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.46B and revenue of 2.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
VRSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.90M and revenue of 806.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.
BAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 279.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
VRSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported an operating income of 363.70M and revenue of 806.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
BAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 198.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
VRSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Verisk Analytics, Inc. reported a net income of 228.60M and revenue of 806.30M, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAH and VRSK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAH has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to VRSK (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAH dropped -66.59% vs VRSK's -50.81%.
BAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAH and VRSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer