BAH vs. FCN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN).

Performance

BAH vs. FCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAH vs. FCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation	-6.80%	-33.02%	2.00%	24.47%	25.71%	-1.04%	24.46%	60.16%	20.21%	7.77%
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc.	3.48%	-10.62%	-4.03%	25.41%	3.51%	37.33%	0.96%	66.06%	55.12%	-4.70%

Fundamentals

EPS BAH : $6.77 FCN : $12.42
PE Ratio BAH : 11.53 FCN : 14.24
PEG Ratio BAH : 0.38 FCN : 3.10
PS Ratio BAH : 0.85 FCN : 1.02
Total Revenue (TTM) BAH : $11.41B FCN : $3.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) BAH : $6.01B FCN : $1.22B
EBITDA (TTM) BAH : $1.13B FCN : $389.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -6.80% return, which is significantly lower than FCN's 3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed FCN with an annualized return of 11.80%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.37% annualized return.

BAH

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: -6.80%
• 6M: -20.82%
• 1Y: -23.53%
• 3Y*: -3.83%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

FCN

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 7.51%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 9.35%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: -3.60%
• 5Y*: 4.45%
• 10Y*: 17.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BAH vs. FCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH

BAH Risk / Return Rank: 20
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FCN

FCN Risk / Return Rank: 52
FCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FCN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCN Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAH vs. FCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAH	FCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	0.31	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	0.60	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.08	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	0.61	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	1.57	-2.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAH vs. FCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and FCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAH	FCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	0.31	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.16	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.57	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.30	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and FCN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BAH vs. FCN - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation	2.87%	2.61%	1.59%	1.47%	1.65%	1.75%	1.42%	1.35%	1.69%	1.78%	1.66%	1.69%
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BAH vs. FCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -58.75%, smaller than the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and FCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAH	FCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.75%	-88.02%	+29.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.32%	-14.82%	-26.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.75%	-34.34%	-24.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.75%	-34.34%	-24.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.66%	-23.48%	-33.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.16%	-30.31%	+20.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.21%	5.79%	+19.42%

Volatility

BAH vs. FCN - Volatility Comparison

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 6.81%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAH	FCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	6.81%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.63%	20.36%	+11.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.94%	25.26%	+14.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.40%	28.48%	+1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.38%	30.63%	-2.25%

Financials

BAH vs. FCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and FTI Consulting, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 307.67M and revenue of 990.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 230.00M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 990.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 200.00M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 54.53M and revenue of 990.75M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.