BAH vs. FCN
Compare and contrast key facts about Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAH or FCN.
Correlation
The correlation between BAH and FCN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BAH vs. FCN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BAH:
-0.74
FCN:
-0.92
BAH:
-0.89
FCN:
-1.04
BAH:
0.88
FCN:
0.83
BAH:
-0.56
FCN:
-0.75
BAH:
-1.23
FCN:
-1.75
BAH:
20.30%
FCN:
13.58%
BAH:
33.80%
FCN:
25.89%
BAH:
-44.33%
FCN:
-88.05%
BAH:
-40.82%
FCN:
-31.62%
Fundamentals
BAH:
$13.55B
FCN:
$5.67B
BAH:
$6.70
FCN:
$7.81
BAH:
16.30
FCN:
20.22
BAH:
2.29
FCN:
1.61
BAH:
$9.01B
FCN:
$2.77B
BAH:
$3.98B
FCN:
$878.33M
BAH:
$1.23B
FCN:
$291.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -14.75% return, which is significantly higher than FCN's -17.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has outperformed FCN with an annualized return of 16.40%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively lower 15.36% annualized return.
BAH
-14.75%
-0.67%
-31.55%
-24.27%
11.14%
16.40%
FCN
-17.36%
-6.98%
-29.92%
-23.21%
5.27%
15.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAH vs. FCN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BAH
FCN
BAH vs. FCN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAH vs. FCN - Dividend Comparison
BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 1.90% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% | 9.16% |
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAH vs. FCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -44.33%, smaller than the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and FCN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAH vs. FCN - Volatility Comparison
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 5.47%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BAH vs. FCN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and FTI Consulting, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities