BAH vs. FCN

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than FCN's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has outperformed FCN with an annualized return of 21.12%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively lower 17.47% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and FCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -32.40%, smaller than the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and FCN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 19.16% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 14.09%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and FTI Consulting, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.