PortfoliosLab logo
BAH vs. FCN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and FCN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BAH vs. FCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAH:

-0.42

FCN:

-0.93

Sortino Ratio

BAH:

-0.29

FCN:

-1.05

Omega Ratio

BAH:

0.96

FCN:

0.83

Calmar Ratio

BAH:

-0.28

FCN:

-0.72

Martin Ratio

BAH:

-0.52

FCN:

-1.46

Ulcer Index

BAH:

23.76%

FCN:

16.77%

Daily Std Dev

BAH:

34.01%

FCN:

26.90%

Max Drawdown

BAH:

-44.33%

FCN:

-88.05%

Current Drawdown

BAH:

-30.19%

FCN:

-27.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAH:

$15.98B

FCN:

$5.72B

EPS

BAH:

$6.70

FCN:

$7.32

PE Ratio

BAH:

19.23

FCN:

22.79

PEG Ratio

BAH:

2.29

FCN:

1.61

PS Ratio

BAH:

1.36

FCN:

1.56

PB Ratio

BAH:

13.09

FCN:

2.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAH:

$9.01B

FCN:

$3.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAH:

$4.97B

FCN:

$1.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAH:

$1.24B

FCN:

$383.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FCN's -12.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has outperformed FCN with an annualized return of 18.37%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively lower 15.41% annualized return.


BAH

YTD

0.55%

1M

13.31%

6M

-13.37%

1Y

-14.15%

5Y*

14.71%

10Y*

18.37%

FCN

YTD

-12.71%

1M

0.95%

6M

-14.42%

1Y

-25.22%

5Y*

6.41%

10Y*

15.41%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAH vs. FCN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAH is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAH is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAH is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAH is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAH is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAH is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FCN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCN is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCN is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCN is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCN is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCN is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCN is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAH vs. FCN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is higher than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and FCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BAH vs. FCN - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while FCN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
1.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%9.16%
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAH vs. FCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -44.33%, smaller than the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and FCN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BAH vs. FCN - Volatility Comparison

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 5.92%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BAH vs. FCN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and FTI Consulting, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.92B
898.28M
(BAH) Total Revenue
(FCN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAH vs. FCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and FTI Consulting, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
55.2%
32.2%
(BAH) Gross Margin
(FCN) Gross Margin
BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.61B and revenue of 2.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 289.35M and revenue of 898.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 291.26M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 78.71M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 186.95M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 61.82M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.