PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAIA vs. FANG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAIA vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saia, Inc. (SAIA) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAIA achieves a 47.88% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's 29.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIA has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 34.25%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


SAIA

1D
-0.88%
1M
5.13%
YTD
47.88%
6M
39.94%
1Y
85.14%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
34.25%

FANG

1D
0.28%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
29.28%
6M
24.04%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
22.17%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAIA vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAIA
Saia, Inc.
47.88%-28.35%4.00%108.99%-37.79%86.41%94.16%66.82%-21.10%60.25%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
29.28%-5.64%10.35%19.66%35.34%127.51%-46.00%0.92%-26.35%24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SAIA and FANG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between SAIA and FANG has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAIA:

$12.94B

FANG:

$54.33B

EPS

SAIA:

$9.52

FANG:

$1.40

PE Ratio

SAIA:

50.72

FANG:

137.12

PS Ratio

SAIA:

3.98

FANG:

3.64

PB Ratio

SAIA:

4.93

FANG:

1.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAIA:

$3.25B

FANG:

$15.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAIA:

$1.27B

FANG:

$7.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAIA:

$603.31M

FANG:

$5.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAIA vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAIA
SAIA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SAIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SAIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
FANG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAIA vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saia, Inc. (SAIA) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAIAFANGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.56

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

4.99

+4.09

SAIA vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIA and FANG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAIA vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIA drawdown since its inception was -80.35%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIA and FANG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAIAFANGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.35%

-88.72%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.92%

-12.53%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.94%

-42.10%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.94%

-42.10%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.94%

-88.72%

+27.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.31%

-9.59%

-10.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.96%

-19.37%

-9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

6.43%

+3.04%

Volatility

SAIA vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

Saia, Inc. (SAIA) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) have volatilities of 11.47% and 11.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAIAFANGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

11.03%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.98%

24.10%

+10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.97%

31.48%

+16.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.37%

37.99%

+13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.75%

49.05%

-3.30%

Dividends

SAIA vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

SAIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
2.16%2.66%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%
SAIA
Saia, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAIA vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saia, Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
806.23M
4.24B
(SAIA) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAIA vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Saia, Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.0%
90.9%
Portfolio components
SAIA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saia, Inc. reported a gross profit of 741.90M and revenue of 806.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.0%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.

SAIA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saia, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.81M and revenue of 806.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

SAIA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saia, Inc. reported a net income of 49.87M and revenue of 806.23M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAIA and FANG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAIA has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to FANG (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIA dropped -80.35% vs FANG's -88.72%.

SAIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAIA and FANG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer