SAEF vs. RUNN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAEF returned 14.01%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for RUNN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RUNN.

Performance

SAEF vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -3.68% return.

SAEF

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 5.87%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 11.57%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 14.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUNN

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: -3.68%
• 6M: -5.23%
• 1Y: -3.62%
• 3Y*: 8.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEF vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF	13.47%	2.31%	16.14%	9.01%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-3.68%	2.30%	17.16%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEF and RUNN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023	0.83

The correlation between SAEF and RUNN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAEF vs. RUNN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAEF	RUNN
Consumer Cyclical	22.6%	8.3%
Industrials	20.3%	39.4%
Financial Services	15.0%	12.8%
Technology	14.7%	17.8%
Healthcare	10.0%	13.3%
Communication Services	7.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	4.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.3%	2.0%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SAEF vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEF

SAEF Risk / Return Rank: 37
SAEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SAEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SAEF Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SAEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SAEF Martin Ratio Rank: 35

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 6
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEF vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAEF	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	-0.28	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	-0.31	+2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.97	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	-0.35	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.77	-0.77	+5.54

SAEF vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEF and RUNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAEF vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAEF	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.05%	-16.83%	-11.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-10.34%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.40%	-16.83%	-10.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-8.54%	+8.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-3.61%	-6.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	4.73%	-0.01%

Volatility

SAEF vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) at 3.93%. This indicates that SAEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAEF	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	3.93%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	9.96%	+4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.84%	13.04%	+5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.37%	13.80%	+7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.37%	13.80%	+7.57%

SAEF vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAEF vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than RUNN's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.58%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF	0.44%	0.38%	0.46%	0.46%	0.61%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAEF and RUNN in my portfolio?

SAEF and RUNN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAEF or RUNN?

SAEF has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to RUNN (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEF dropped -28.05% vs RUNN's -16.83%.

Which ETF is better, SAEF or RUNN?

On 3-year performance, SAEF leads with 14.01% vs 8.27% for RUNN. On fees, RUNN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RUNN has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAEF or RUNN?

Over the 3-year period, SAEF has performed better with a 14.01% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAEF or RUNN?

RUNN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAEF or RUNN?

RUNN has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.44% for SAEF.

What is the main difference between SAEF and RUNN?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Running Oak Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.58% for RUNN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.