RUNN vs. FRTY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) and FRTY (Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RUNN is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Running Oak, while FRTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RUNN returned 8.49%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for FRTY. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RUNN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FRTY.

Performance

RUNN vs. FRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUNN achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than FRTY's 5.48% return.

RUNN

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: -1.57%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 1Y: 1.69%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.45%

FRTY

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -4.84%
• 6M: 5.40%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF	$353.31K	$584.27K	$524.74K
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	$6.62M	$3.92M	$2.57M

RUNN vs. FRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	1.94%	2.30%	17.16%	11.90%
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF	5.48%	12.82%	38.86%	9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RUNN and FRTY is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between RUNN and FRTY has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RUNN vs. FRTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RUNN	FRTY
Industrials	36.0%	26.9%
Technology	19.6%	37.5%
Healthcare	13.3%	19.0%
Financial Services	12.8%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.4%
Communication Services	2.1%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	6.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

RUNN vs. FRTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 11
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FRTY

FRTY Risk / Return Rank: 18
FRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RUNN vs. FRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RUNN	FRTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	0.33	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	0.63	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.08	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	0.46	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.10	1.12	-1.01

RUNN vs. FRTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the FRTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUNN and FRTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RUNN vs. FRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUNN drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, smaller than the maximum FRTY drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUNN and FRTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RUNN	FRTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.83%	-53.15%	+36.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-19.75%	+9.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-31.48%	+14.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	-10.52%	+7.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-27.30%	+23.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	8.09%	-3.19%

Volatility

RUNN vs. FRTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is 5.07%, while Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that RUNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RUNN	FRTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	9.32%	-4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.41%	21.49%	-11.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	27.75%	-14.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	27.66%	-13.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	27.33%	-13.43%

RUNN vs. FRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RUNN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FRTY's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RUNN vs. FRTY - Dividend Comparison

RUNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than FRTY's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF	0.18%	0.19%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	5.35%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.54%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RUNN and FRTY in my portfolio?

RUNN and FRTY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RUNN or FRTY?

FRTY has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to RUNN (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUNN dropped -16.83% vs FRTY's -53.15%.

Which ETF is better, RUNN or FRTY?

On 3-year performance, FRTY leads with 19.02% vs 8.49% for RUNN. On fees, RUNN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RUNN has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RUNN or FRTY?

Over the 3-year period, FRTY has performed better with a 19.02% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RUNN or FRTY?

RUNN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FRTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RUNN or FRTY?

RUNN has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.18% for FRTY.

What is the main difference between RUNN and FRTY?

RUNN is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FRTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Running Oak and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RUNN and 0.60% for FRTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.