Correlation
The correlation between RUNN and RECS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
RUNN vs. RECS
Compare and contrast key facts about Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS).
RUNN and RECS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RUNN is an actively managed fund by ROC. It was launched on Jun 7, 2023. RECS is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RUNN or RECS.
Performance
RUNN vs. RECS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
RUNN:
0.56
RECS:
0.72
RUNN:
0.85
RECS:
1.03
RUNN:
1.11
RECS:
1.15
RUNN:
0.51
RECS:
0.67
RUNN:
1.62
RECS:
2.58
RUNN:
5.33%
RECS:
4.84%
RUNN:
16.97%
RECS:
19.33%
RUNN:
-16.83%
RECS:
-34.29%
RUNN:
-6.16%
RECS:
-3.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUNN achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than RECS's 0.81% return.
RUNN
1.09%
3.98%
-6.16%
9.49%
N/A
N/A
N/A
RECS
0.81%
6.34%
-2.08%
13.82%
14.04%
16.74%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RUNN vs. RECS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUNN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RECS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RUNN vs. RECS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RUNN
RECS
RUNN vs. RECS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
RUNN vs. RECS - Dividend Comparison
RUNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than RECS's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | 1.08% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 20.65% | 1.09% | 0.49% |
Drawdowns
RUNN vs. RECS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUNN drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, smaller than the maximum RECS drawdown of -34.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUNN and RECS.
Loading data...
Volatility
RUNN vs. RECS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is 4.52%, while Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that RUNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RECS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...