SACAX vs. PMAQX
SACAX (Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio) and PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) are both mutual funds - SACAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Principal, while PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 5 years, SACAX returned 10.38%/yr vs 4.56%/yr for PMAQX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SACAX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PMAQX.
Performance
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SACAX achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than PMAQX's -3.68% return.
SACAX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.42%
PMAQX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | 10.88% | 16.56% | 24.20% | 21.42% | -19.06% | 19.34% | 15.11% | 26.87% | -9.13% | 21.68% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -3.68% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SACAX and PMAQX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SACAX and PMAQX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SACAX vs. PMAQX — Risk / Return Rank
SACAX
PMAQX
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SACAX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.91 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | -0.48 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | -0.94 | +10.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than PMAQX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and PMAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SACAX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -40.56% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -19.25% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -19.25% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.96% | -31.10% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -9.95% | +9.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -6.89% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 9.79% | -7.74% |
Volatility
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) is 3.43%, while Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that SACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SACAX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 5.19% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 12.03% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 15.17% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 18.75% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 19.43% | -3.41% |
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAQX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SACAX vs. PMAQX - Dividend Comparison
SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than PMAQX's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.02% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | 10.82% | 11.99% | 13.37% | 1.16% | 9.30% | 7.53% | 4.02% | 4.47% | 20.79% | 6.82% | 3.68% | 14.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SACAX and PMAQX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMAQX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to SACAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACAX dropped -54.31% vs PMAQX's -40.56%.
SACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SACAX and PMAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer