PMAQX vs. CGMS
PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both funds - PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal Funds, while CGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, PMAQX returned 9.54%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for CGMS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGMS.
Performance
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than CGMS's 1.29% return.
PMAQX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- -7.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- —
CGMS
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -4.15% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | 3.46% |
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.29% | 7.52% | 7.24% | 11.51% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAQX and CGMS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PMAQX and CGMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAQX vs. CGMS — Risk / Return Rank
PMAQX
CGMS
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAQX | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.28 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 2.09 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 9.26 | -10.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than CGMS's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and CGMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAQX | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -4.08% | -36.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -2.47% | -16.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -4.08% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -0.69% | -9.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -0.66% | -6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 0.56% | +8.91% |
Volatility
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Volatility Comparison
Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) at 1.06%. This indicates that PMAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAQX | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 1.06% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 2.82% | +8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 3.47% | +11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 5.10% | +13.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 5.10% | +14.34% |
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAQX vs. CGMS - Dividend Comparison
PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, less than CGMS's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF | 6.16% | 6.00% | 5.91% | 5.84% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.05% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAQX and CGMS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMAQX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to CGMS (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs CGMS's -4.08%.
CGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAQX and CGMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer