SACAX vs. PLFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX).
SACAX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Jul 24, 1996. PLFIX is a passively managed fund by Principal that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2001.
Performance
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | -3.93% | 16.56% | 24.20% | 21.42% | -19.06% | 19.34% | 15.11% | 26.87% | -9.13% | 21.68% |
PLFIX Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional | -7.07% | 17.77% | 26.77% | 26.00% | -18.21% | 28.25% | 18.11% | 31.35% | -4.66% | 21.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SACAX achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly higher than PLFIX's -7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SACAX has underperformed PLFIX with an annualized return of 10.78%, while PLFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.
SACAX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
PLFIX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- 14.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFIX's 0.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SACAX vs. PLFIX — Risk / Return Rank
SACAX
PLFIX
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SACAX | PLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.85 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 5.14 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SACAX | PLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.85 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.69 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.79 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between SACAX and PLFIX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Dividend Comparison
SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than PLFIX's 3.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | 12.48% | 11.99% | 13.37% | 1.16% | 9.30% | 7.53% | 4.02% | 4.47% | 20.79% | 6.82% | 3.68% | 14.08% |
PLFIX Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional | 3.17% | 2.95% | 4.28% | 4.13% | 2.96% | 13.60% | 7.57% | 3.83% | 7.52% | 7.01% | 3.23% | 2.69% |
Drawdowns
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, roughly equal to the maximum PLFIX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and PLFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SACAX | PLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -55.28% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -12.13% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.96% | -24.58% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.90% | -33.77% | -1.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.85% | -8.90% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -8.91% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.48% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SACAX vs. PLFIX - Volatility Comparison
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX) at 4.24%. This indicates that SACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SACAX | PLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 4.24% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 9.06% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 17.85% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 16.87% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 17.48% | -1.50% |