PMAQX vs. SCHM
PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both funds - PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal Funds, while SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Over the past 5 years, PMAQX returned 5.48%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for SCHM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.
Performance
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 21.21% return.
PMAQX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -7.15%
- 1Y
- -6.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHM
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -5.92% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 21.21% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAQX and SCHM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PMAQX and SCHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAQX vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank
PMAQX
SCHM
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAQX | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 3.75 | -4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 14.98 | -15.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and SCHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAQX | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -42.43% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -9.32% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -23.27% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.10% | -26.46% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | 0.00% | -12.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -5.64% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.09% | 2.33% | +6.76% |
Volatility
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) is 4.40%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that PMAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAQX | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 5.46% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 12.47% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 16.23% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 19.65% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 20.51% | -1.04% |
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAQX vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than SCHM's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.17% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.20% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAQX and SCHM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHM has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to PMAQX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs SCHM's -42.43%.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAQX and SCHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer