SACAX vs. LTRIX
SACAX (Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio) and LTRIX (Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund) are both mutual funds - SACAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Principal, while LTRIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, SACAX returned 12.25%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for LTRIX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SACAX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTRIX.
Performance
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SACAX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than LTRIX's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SACAX has outperformed LTRIX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while LTRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.01% annualized return.
SACAX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
LTRIX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 21.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | 11.70% | 16.56% | 24.20% | 21.42% | -19.06% | 19.34% | 15.11% | 26.87% | -9.13% | 21.68% |
LTRIX Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund | 8.73% | 16.69% | 16.90% | 19.40% | -18.51% | 16.55% | 16.33% | 25.81% | -8.34% | 21.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SACAX and LTRIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2008 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SACAX and LTRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SACAX vs. LTRIX — Risk / Return Rank
SACAX
LTRIX
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SACAX | LTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.68 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | 12.01 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SACAX | LTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.01 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.60 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.75 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than LTRIX's maximum drawdown of -51.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and LTRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SACAX | LTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -51.39% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.04% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -14.47% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.96% | -26.25% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.90% | -31.56% | -3.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -7.20% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.79% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Volatility Comparison
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) at 3.06%. This indicates that SACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SACAX | LTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 3.06% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 8.62% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 10.73% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 14.59% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 14.82% | +1.23% |
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than LTRIX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SACAX vs. LTRIX - Dividend Comparison
SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than LTRIX's 8.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTRIX Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund | 8.56% | 9.31% | 9.40% | 4.25% | 8.71% | 6.75% | 4.62% | 6.93% | 7.50% | 4.57% | 4.48% | 5.42% |
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | 10.74% | 11.99% | 13.37% | 1.16% | 9.30% | 7.53% | 4.02% | 4.47% | 20.79% | 6.82% | 3.68% | 14.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SACAX and LTRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SACAX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to LTRIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACAX dropped -54.31% vs LTRIX's -51.39%.
SACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SACAX and LTRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer