PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRIX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRIX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LTRIX has outperformed LTIUX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while LTIUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.75% annualized return.


LTRIX

1D
-1.58%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
6.10%
6M
5.34%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.15%

LTIUX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
4.82%
6M
4.28%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
6.10%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-8.34%21.38%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
4.82%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRIX and LTIUX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

0.99

The correlation between LTRIX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRIX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTRIXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.15

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

9.40

+0.02

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRIX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRIX drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, roughly equal to the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRIX and LTIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRIXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-49.65%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-6.57%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-11.08%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-24.23%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-28.12%

-3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.76%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-6.69%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.50%

+0.33%

Volatility

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) at 3.63%. This indicates that LTRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRIXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.63%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

7.62%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

9.18%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

11.91%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

12.46%

+2.34%

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTRIX and LTIUX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTRIX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

LTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, more than LTIUX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.61%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.77%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LTRIX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTRIX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to LTIUX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRIX dropped -51.39% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

LTIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRIX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer