PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRIX vs. FHNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6 (FHNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LTRIX having a 6.10% return and FHNDX slightly higher at 6.12%.


LTRIX

1D
-1.58%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
6.10%
6M
5.34%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.15%

FHNDX

1D
-1.04%
1M
0.49%
YTD
6.12%
6M
5.69%
1Y
14.16%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
6.10%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-12.69%
FHNDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6
6.12%14.56%7.19%12.95%-16.38%8.72%13.59%18.58%-6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRIX and FHNDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.92

The correlation between LTRIX and FHNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRIX vs. FHNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FHNDX
FHNDX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6 (FHNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTRIXFHNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.77

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

11.79

-2.37

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FHNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRIX and FHNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRIX drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, which is greater than FHNDX's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRIX and FHNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRIXFHNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-22.68%

-28.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-5.46%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-7.87%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-22.68%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.36%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-4.76%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.28%

+0.55%

Volatility

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6 (FHNDX) at 3.35%. This indicates that LTRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRIXFHNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.35%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

6.43%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

7.48%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

9.05%

+5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

9.74%

+5.06%

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTRIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FHNDX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTRIX vs. FHNDX - Dividend Comparison

LTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, more than FHNDX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHNDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6
3.58%2.77%2.62%2.66%5.94%7.22%4.45%3.01%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.77%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LTRIX and FHNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTRIX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FHNDX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRIX dropped -51.39% vs FHNDX's -22.68%.

FHNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRIX and FHNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer