PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAA vs. VIOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAA vs. VIOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than VIOG's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has outperformed VIOG with an annualized return of 11.62%, while VIOG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


SAA

1D
1.62%
1M
2.29%
YTD
30.42%
6M
31.77%
1Y
66.46%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
11.62%

VIOG

1D
0.75%
1M
0.93%
YTD
16.12%
6M
15.96%
1Y
28.91%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAA vs. VIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
30.42%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
16.12%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and VIOG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.88

The correlation between SAA and VIOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAA vs. VIOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAA
VIOG

Financial Services

16.9%
13.7%

Industrials

15.5%
19.5%

Technology

15.5%
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.9%

Healthcare

11.0%
14.6%

Real Estate

7.7%
6.6%

Energy

5.9%
4.1%

Basic Materials

5.1%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.3%

Utilities

2.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

SAA
16.9%
VIOG
13.7%

Industrials

SAA
15.5%
VIOG
19.5%

Technology

SAA
15.5%
VIOG
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SAA
13.4%
VIOG
10.9%

Healthcare

SAA
11.0%
VIOG
14.6%

Real Estate

SAA
7.7%
VIOG
6.6%

Energy

SAA
5.9%
VIOG
4.1%

Basic Materials

SAA
5.1%
VIOG
3.1%

Communication Services

SAA
3.6%
VIOG
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

SAA
3.5%
VIOG
3.3%

Utilities

SAA
2.0%
VIOG
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAA vs. VIOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAA vs. VIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAAVIOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.66

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

2.46

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.19

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

10.91

+0.54

SAA vs. VIOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the VIOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and VIOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAAVIOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.66

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.27

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.48

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.60

-0.41

Drawdowns

SAA vs. VIOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than VIOG's maximum drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and VIOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAVIOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-41.73%

-45.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-9.03%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.84%

-27.35%

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-29.15%

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

-41.73%

-32.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-0.83%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-7.62%

-19.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

2.64%

+2.99%

Volatility

SAA vs. VIOG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) at 4.60%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAVIOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

4.60%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.86%

12.45%

+11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.90%

17.46%

+18.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.53%

21.48%

+22.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.13%

22.84%

+23.29%

SAA vs. VIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOG's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAA vs. VIOG - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VIOG's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.77%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%0.00%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.83%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SAA and VIOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SAA has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to VIOG (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs VIOG's -41.73%.

On 10-year performance, SAA leads with 11.62% vs 10.90% for VIOG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SAA has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.77% for SAA.

SAA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VIOG is Small Cap Growth Equities. SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.15% for VIOG.

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAA and VIOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer