PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZV vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZV vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RZV having a 21.03% return and SPSM slightly lower at 20.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RZV having a 11.15% annualized return and SPSM not far ahead at 11.60%.


RZV

1D
-0.09%
1M
5.47%
YTD
21.03%
6M
20.88%
1Y
41.43%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
11.15%

SPSM

1D
1.12%
1M
5.43%
YTD
20.66%
6M
17.75%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZV vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
21.03%8.65%5.06%22.97%-6.80%45.95%-3.88%22.29%-19.66%1.25%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
20.66%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and SPSM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

0.90

The correlation between RZV and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RZV vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RZV
SPSM

Consumer Cyclical

25.9%
13.1%

Industrials

15.9%
15.2%

Technology

10.5%
17.1%

Energy

8.8%
5.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

7.4%
16.5%

Basic Materials

6.2%
5.0%

Real Estate

4.8%
7.6%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.7%

Utilities

0.4%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RZV
25.9%
SPSM
13.1%

Industrials

RZV
15.9%
SPSM
15.2%

Technology

RZV
10.5%
SPSM
17.1%

Energy

RZV
8.8%
SPSM
5.4%

Healthcare

RZV
8.4%
SPSM
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

RZV
7.6%
SPSM
3.6%

Financial Services

RZV
7.4%
SPSM
16.5%

Basic Materials

RZV
6.2%
SPSM
5.0%

Real Estate

RZV
4.8%
SPSM
7.6%

Communication Services

RZV
4.0%
SPSM
3.7%

Utilities

RZV
0.4%
SPSM
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZV vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZV vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RZVSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

4.01

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

13.53

-2.77

RZV vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RZV vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than SPSM's maximum drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZVSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-42.89%

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-8.72%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-27.94%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-27.94%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

-42.89%

-17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

0.00%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-7.89%

-5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.58%

+1.28%

Volatility

RZV vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.98%. This indicates that RZV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZVSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.98%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

12.08%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

17.64%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

21.42%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.99%

22.99%

+4.00%

RZV vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZV vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SPSM's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.45%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.40%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, RZV and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RZV has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to SPSM (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 10-year performance, SPSM leads with 11.60% vs 11.15% for RZV. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.40% for SPSM.

RZV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SPSM is Small Cap Blend Equities. RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.03% for SPSM.

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZV and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer