RZV vs. RPV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV).
RZV and RPV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RZV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. RPV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both RZV and RPV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RZV or RPV.
Correlation
The correlation between RZV and RPV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RZV vs. RPV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RZV:
0.33
RPV:
0.75
RZV:
0.63
RPV:
1.16
RZV:
1.07
RPV:
1.14
RZV:
0.71
RPV:
1.20
RZV:
1.40
RPV:
3.50
RZV:
5.32%
RPV:
3.14%
RZV:
22.85%
RPV:
14.61%
RZV:
-77.11%
RPV:
-75.32%
RZV:
-7.01%
RPV:
-8.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than RPV's 10.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RZV having a 7.00% annualized return and RPV not far ahead at 7.25%.
RZV
4.42%
-1.79%
12.39%
4.91%
11.21%
7.00%
RPV
10.07%
-5.82%
7.57%
9.71%
7.64%
7.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RZV vs. RPV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RZV and RPV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RZV vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RZV vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison
RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than RPV's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 0.85% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% | 0.68% | 0.64% |
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 1.63% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% | 1.57% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
RZV vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, roughly equal to the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and RPV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RZV vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) at 3.99%. This indicates that RZV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.