RZV vs. PSCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC).
RZV and PSCC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RZV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. PSCC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. Both RZV and PSCC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RZV or PSCC.
Correlation
The correlation between RZV and PSCC is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RZV vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RZV:
0.30
PSCC:
0.19
RZV:
0.59
PSCC:
0.37
RZV:
1.07
PSCC:
1.04
RZV:
0.64
PSCC:
0.30
RZV:
1.27
PSCC:
0.62
RZV:
5.35%
PSCC:
4.83%
RZV:
22.67%
PSCC:
16.21%
RZV:
-77.11%
PSCC:
-33.61%
RZV:
-6.97%
PSCC:
-6.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RZV has underperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 7.00%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.
RZV
4.47%
-1.36%
11.42%
5.10%
11.20%
7.00%
PSCC
1.39%
-0.62%
9.52%
2.39%
9.27%
9.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RZV vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RZV vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RZV vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than PSCC's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 0.85% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% | 0.68% | 0.64% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% | 1.60% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
RZV vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and PSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RZV vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) at 5.24%. This indicates that RZV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.