PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZV vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZV vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RZV having a 19.02% return and AVUV slightly higher at 19.12%.


RZV

1D
0.85%
1M
1.83%
YTD
19.02%
6M
17.44%
1Y
46.10%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
10.76%

AVUV

1D
0.92%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.12%
6M
20.66%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZV vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
19.02%8.65%5.06%22.97%-6.80%45.95%-3.88%9.25%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.12%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and AVUV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.95

The correlation between RZV and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RZV vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RZV
AVUV

Consumer Cyclical

26.1%
18.0%

Industrials

15.7%
13.9%

Energy

9.7%
18.2%

Technology

8.9%
7.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.5%

Financial Services

7.3%
25.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

5.0%
0.7%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.8%

Utilities

0.4%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RZV
26.1%
AVUV
18.0%

Industrials

RZV
15.7%
AVUV
13.9%

Energy

RZV
9.7%
AVUV
18.2%

Technology

RZV
8.9%
AVUV
7.0%

Healthcare

RZV
8.8%
AVUV
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

RZV
7.7%
AVUV
4.5%

Financial Services

RZV
7.3%
AVUV
25.8%

Basic Materials

RZV
6.4%
AVUV
4.9%

Real Estate

RZV
5.0%
AVUV
0.7%

Communication Services

RZV
4.2%
AVUV
2.8%

Utilities

RZV
0.4%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZV vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZV vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RZVAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.29

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

3.26

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

4.99

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.76

14.84

-3.08

RZV vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RZVAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.29

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.48

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.56

-0.29

Drawdowns

RZV vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZVAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-49.42%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-7.95%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-28.79%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-28.79%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.61%

-7.96%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.67%

+1.18%

Volatility

RZV vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.14%. This indicates that RZV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZVAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

4.14%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

11.28%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.66%

17.50%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.36%

22.73%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.04%

28.30%

-1.26%

RZV vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZV vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than AVUV's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.33%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


RZV and AVUV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RZV has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to AVUV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 9.03% for RZV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.28% for AVUV.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZV and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer