RYWCX vs. FCAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX).
RYWCX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004. FCAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Performance
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund | 5.56% | 7.76% | 7.20% | 17.03% | -30.33% | 16.37% | 15.23% | 11.58% | -9.55% | 15.23% |
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 0.19% | 10.88% | 20.21% | 18.72% | -25.57% | 10.19% | 36.01% | 35.97% | -4.85% | 28.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYWCX achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than FCAGX's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWCX has underperformed FCAGX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while FCAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
RYWCX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
FCAGX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYWCX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FCAGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYWCX vs. FCAGX — Risk / Return Rank
RYWCX
FCAGX
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYWCX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.01 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.52 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.81 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 6.68 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYWCX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.01 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.18 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.58 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.47 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYWCX and FCAGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Dividend Comparison
RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 59.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.26% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 6.93% | 6.94% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.36% | 8.58% | 5.58% | 14.80% | 7.05% | 0.79% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYWCX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FCAGX drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWCX and FCAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYWCX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.64% | -61.19% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -13.19% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.28% | -39.13% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.65% | -39.13% | -15.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.02% | -7.89% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -11.56% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.73% | -0.47% |
Volatility
RYWCX vs. FCAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) is 8.13%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that RYWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYWCX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 9.75% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 16.79% | -3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 24.96% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 23.41% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 22.74% | +1.95% |