FCAGX vs. FSCDX

In the year-to-date period, FCAGX achieves a -9.16% return, which is significantly lower than FSCDX's -7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed FSCDX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while FSCDX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCDX's 1.22% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the FSCDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and FSCDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than FSCDX's 1.87% yield.

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, which is greater than FSCDX's maximum drawdown of -51.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and FSCDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) at 7.29%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.