FCAGX vs. FSCDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FCAGX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A) and FSCDX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FCAGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSCDX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX returned 14.93%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for FSCDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCAGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for FSCDX.

Performance

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCAGX having a 23.58% return and FSCDX slightly lower at 22.77%. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed FSCDX with an annualized return of 14.93%, while FSCDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.

FCAGX

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 23.58%
• 6M: 19.24%
• 1Y: 43.71%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 14.93%

FSCDX

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 22.77%
• 6M: 19.43%
• 1Y: 40.44%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A	23.58%	10.88%	20.21%	18.72%	-25.57%	10.19%	36.01%	35.97%	-4.85%	28.62%
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A	22.77%	11.85%	-2.52%	18.29%	-20.70%	31.22%	17.13%	32.31%	-16.38%	13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAGX and FSCDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004	0.93

The correlation between FCAGX and FSCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCAGX vs. FSCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAGX

FCAGX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FCAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FCAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FCAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FCAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FCAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FSCDX

FSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCAGX	FSCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.23	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.16	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	4.36	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.09	16.29	-3.20

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FSCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and FSCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than FSCDX's maximum drawdown of -50.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and FSCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAGX	FSCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.19%	-50.10%	-11.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.19%	-9.33%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.76%	-35.42%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.13%	-35.42%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.13%	-40.44%	+1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.46%	-11.61%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	2.49%	+0.81%

Volatility

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) at 6.44%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAGX	FSCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.14%	6.44%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.43%	13.77%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.22%	18.24%	+3.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.66%	22.25%	+1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	22.04%	+0.90%

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCDX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Dividend Comparison

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than FSCDX's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A	5.62%	6.94%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	20.36%	8.58%	5.58%	14.80%	7.05%	0.79%	4.32%
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A	1.56%	1.92%	0.00%	1.36%	5.36%	10.98%	2.70%	3.97%	14.60%	14.03%	2.35%	8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAGX and FSCDX in my portfolio?

FCAGX and FSCDX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCAGX or FSCDX?

FCAGX has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to FSCDX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAGX dropped -61.19% vs FSCDX's -50.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.