FCAGX vs. FSCDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX).
FCAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. FSCDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 1998.
Performance
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | -5.57% | 10.88% | 20.21% | 18.72% | -25.57% | 10.19% | 36.01% | 35.97% | -4.85% | 28.62% |
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.63% | 11.85% | -2.52% | 18.29% | -20.70% | 31.22% | 17.13% | 32.31% | -16.38% | 13.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAGX achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than FSCDX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed FSCDX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while FSCDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.24% annualized return.
FCAGX
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- -5.57%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
FSCDX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCDX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCAGX vs. FSCDX — Risk / Return Rank
FCAGX
FSCDX
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAGX | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.03 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.56 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.47 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | 6.28 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAGX | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.03 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.15 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.38 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAGX and FSCDX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Dividend Comparison
FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than FSCDX's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 7.35% | 6.94% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.36% | 8.58% | 5.58% | 14.80% | 7.05% | 0.79% | 4.32% |
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 1.90% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 5.36% | 10.98% | 2.70% | 3.97% | 14.60% | 14.03% | 2.35% | 8.39% |
Drawdowns
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than FSCDX's maximum drawdown of -50.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and FSCDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAGX | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.19% | -50.10% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -13.77% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.13% | -35.42% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.13% | -40.44% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.19% | -10.27% | -2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -11.69% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.21% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FCAGX vs. FSCDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) at 6.42%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCAGX | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | 6.42% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | 12.61% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 21.92% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 22.07% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 21.90% | +0.79% |