PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYWCX vs. JMIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Jacob Discovery Fund (JMIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYWCX achieves a 26.17% return, which is significantly higher than JMIGX's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWCX has underperformed JMIGX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while JMIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


RYWCX

1D
2.18%
1M
8.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
21.54%
1Y
39.57%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
8.02%

JMIGX

1D
1.37%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
43.99%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
-4.83%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
26.17%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%
JMIGX
Jacob Discovery Fund
-2.96%32.71%10.64%4.38%-41.64%14.60%74.01%42.89%10.52%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RYWCX and JMIGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.81

The correlation between RYWCX and JMIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYWCX vs. JMIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

JMIGX
JMIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JMIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JMIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Jacob Discovery Fund (JMIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYWCXJMIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

2.35

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

6.90

+8.58

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYWCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the JMIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYWCX and JMIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYWCX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, smaller than the maximum JMIGX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWCX and JMIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYWCXJMIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.64%

-70.25%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-17.70%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-29.40%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-59.40%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.65%

-61.67%

+7.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.82%

+30.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.42%

-26.87%

+13.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

6.02%

-3.45%

Volatility

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) is 5.76%, while Jacob Discovery Fund (JMIGX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that RYWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYWCXJMIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

8.22%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

18.04%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

25.93%

-7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.94%

27.18%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.75%

26.28%

-1.53%

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYWCX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than JMIGX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYWCX vs. JMIGX - Dividend Comparison

RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMIGX
Jacob Discovery Fund
0.52%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.30%6.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.75%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYWCX and JMIGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMIGX has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to RYWCX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYWCX dropped -60.64% vs JMIGX's -70.25%.

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYWCX and JMIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer