PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAGX vs. FCVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCAGX having a 18.45% return and FCVAX slightly higher at 19.06%. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed FCVAX with an annualized return of 14.41%, while FCVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.


FCAGX

1D
0.82%
1M
4.19%
YTD
18.45%
6M
16.46%
1Y
37.60%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
14.41%

FCVAX

1D
1.96%
1M
4.29%
YTD
19.06%
6M
16.58%
1Y
34.37%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
18.45%10.88%20.21%18.72%-25.57%10.19%36.01%35.97%-4.85%28.62%
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
19.06%7.75%7.72%17.47%-13.29%37.77%10.82%20.47%-15.50%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAGX and FCVAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.87

The correlation between FCAGX and FCVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAGX vs. FCVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAGX
FCAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FCAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FCVAX
FCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAGXFCVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.57

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

12.45

-0.34

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FCVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and FCVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAGXFCVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.09

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.37

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.05

Drawdowns

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than FCVAX's maximum drawdown of -57.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and FCVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAGXFCVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-57.86%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-10.41%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.76%

-24.90%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.13%

-24.90%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

-44.71%

+5.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.52%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-8.12%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

2.98%

+0.29%

Volatility

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) at 6.09%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAGXFCVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

6.09%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

12.81%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

17.85%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.47%

20.93%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

22.35%

+0.50%

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FCVAX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAGX vs. FCVAX - Dividend Comparison

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than FCVAX's 8.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.86%6.94%1.20%0.00%0.00%20.36%8.58%5.58%14.80%7.05%0.79%4.32%
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
8.65%10.30%4.77%5.19%6.11%7.94%0.30%3.32%37.11%3.43%7.01%11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAGX and FCVAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCAGX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FCVAX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAGX dropped -61.19% vs FCVAX's -57.86%.

FCVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAGX and FCVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer