PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYWCX vs. WRGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYWCX achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly higher than WRGCX's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWCX has underperformed WRGCX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while WRGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.


RYWCX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
16.78%
6M
16.98%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
7.08%

WRGCX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.27%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.05%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
11.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
16.78%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
12.55%12.23%27.78%12.42%-28.46%1.22%37.76%22.89%-4.54%22.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RYWCX and WRGCX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.92

The correlation between RYWCX and WRGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYWCX vs. WRGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

WRGCX
WRGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WRGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WRGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYWCXWRGCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

1.38

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.01

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.25

+1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.24

9.08

+2.16

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYWCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the WRGCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYWCX and WRGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYWCXWRGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.38

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.11

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.32

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.19

+0.08

Drawdowns

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYWCX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, roughly equal to the maximum WRGCX drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWCX and WRGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYWCXWRGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.64%

-58.56%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-12.25%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-23.30%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-58.56%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.65%

-58.56%

+3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-20.01%

+18.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.45%

-21.34%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.03%

-0.44%

Volatility

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) is 4.68%, while Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that RYWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYWCXWRGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

5.40%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

14.97%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

20.10%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

42.95%

-20.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

34.74%

-10.02%

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYWCX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than WRGCX's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYWCX vs. WRGCX - Dividend Comparison

RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%0.00%
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
11.10%12.50%23.68%9.47%9.84%63.80%12.83%9.29%23.45%13.88%7.73%18.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYWCX and WRGCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRGCX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to RYWCX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYWCX dropped -60.64% vs WRGCX's -58.56%.

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYWCX and WRGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer