PortfoliosLab logo
FCAGX vs. CSMCX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCAGX and CSMCX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
357.68%
93.52%
FCAGX
CSMCX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCAGX:

0.09

CSMCX:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

FCAGX:

0.30

CSMCX:

0.87

Omega Ratio

FCAGX:

1.04

CSMCX:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

FCAGX:

0.06

CSMCX:

0.40

Martin Ratio

FCAGX:

0.23

CSMCX:

1.51

Ulcer Index

FCAGX:

9.28%

CSMCX:

8.05%

Daily Std Dev

FCAGX:

25.37%

CSMCX:

24.91%

Max Drawdown

FCAGX:

-59.24%

CSMCX:

-59.87%

Current Drawdown

FCAGX:

-24.76%

CSMCX:

-18.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAGX achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than CSMCX's -5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed CSMCX with an annualized return of 4.58%, while CSMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.37% annualized return.


FCAGX

YTD

-8.93%

1M

0.68%

6M

-8.85%

1Y

0.64%

5Y*

5.32%

10Y*

4.58%

CSMCX

YTD

-5.80%

1M

0.79%

6M

-3.77%

1Y

9.85%

5Y*

11.75%

10Y*

3.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMCX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FCAGX: current value is 1.29%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FCAGX: 1.29%
Expense ratio chart for CSMCX: current value is 1.00%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CSMCX: 1.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCAGX vs. CSMCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCAGX is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCAGX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCAGX is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCAGX is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCAGX is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCAGX is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSMCX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSMCX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSMCX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSMCX is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSMCX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSMCX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
FCAGX: 0.09
CSMCX: 0.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FCAGX: 0.30
CSMCX: 0.87
The chart of Omega ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FCAGX: 1.04
CSMCX: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FCAGX: 0.06
CSMCX: 0.40
The chart of Martin ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
FCAGX: 0.23
CSMCX: 1.51

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the CSMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and CSMCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.09
0.49
FCAGX
CSMCX

Dividends

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Dividend Comparison

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while CSMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
0.82%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.32%8.61%
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Drawdowns

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CSMCX drawdown of -59.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and CSMCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-24.76%
-18.95%
FCAGX
CSMCX

Volatility

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) have volatilities of 15.14% and 15.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.14%
15.34%
FCAGX
CSMCX