PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCAGX vs. CSMCX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FCAGXCSMCX
YTD Return29.52%27.47%
1Y Return54.96%48.16%
3Y Return (Ann)0.00%-2.11%
5Y Return (Ann)6.72%10.66%
10Y Return (Ann)7.48%3.72%
Sharpe Ratio2.672.41
Sortino Ratio3.553.28
Omega Ratio1.441.41
Calmar Ratio1.251.25
Martin Ratio16.2716.38
Ulcer Index3.26%2.87%
Daily Std Dev19.82%19.45%
Max Drawdown-59.24%-59.87%
Current Drawdown-10.56%-7.57%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FCAGX and CSMCX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FCAGX achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than CSMCX's 27.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed CSMCX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while CSMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.84%
19.00%
FCAGX
CSMCX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMCX's 1.00% expense ratio.


FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expense ratio chart for FCAGX: current value at 1.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.29%
Expense ratio chart for CSMCX: current value at 1.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 3.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCAGX, currently valued at 16.27, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.27
CSMCX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CSMCX, currently valued at 16.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.38

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the CSMCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and CSMCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.67
2.41
FCAGX
CSMCX

Dividends

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Dividend Comparison

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while CSMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.32%8.61%17.23%
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CSMCX drawdown of -59.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and CSMCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.56%
-7.57%
FCAGX
CSMCX

Volatility

FCAGX vs. CSMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) is 5.86%, while Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that FCAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.86%
6.51%
FCAGX
CSMCX