PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. SPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYLD vs. SPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than SPD's 6.70% return.


RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.78%
YTD
8.33%
6M
9.14%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*

SPD

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.09%
YTD
6.70%
6M
5.81%
1Y
14.01%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYLD vs. SPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
8.33%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%14.05%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
6.70%18.86%17.49%20.94%-25.96%24.81%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and SPD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020

0.69

The correlation between RYLD and SPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

RYLD vs. SPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RYLD
SPD

Financial Services

104.9%
11.8%

Industrials

17.5%
8.3%

Technology

16.8%
35.6%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.1%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.9%

Energy

6.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.8%

Utilities

2.9%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Financial Services

RYLD
104.9%
SPD
11.8%

Industrials

RYLD
17.5%
SPD
8.3%

Technology

RYLD
16.8%
SPD
35.6%

Healthcare

RYLD
16.5%
SPD
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RYLD
8.4%
SPD
10.1%

Real Estate

RYLD
6.2%
SPD
1.9%

Energy

RYLD
6.2%
SPD
3.5%

Basic Materials

RYLD
4.8%
SPD
1.8%

Utilities

RYLD
2.9%
SPD
2.4%

Communication Services

RYLD
2.5%
SPD
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

RYLD
2.4%
SPD
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. SPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SPD
SPD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLD vs. SPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYLDSPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.18

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.18

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

3.67

+10.19

RYLD vs. SPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the SPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and SPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYLDSPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.07

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.52

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.69

-0.37

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. SPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than SPD's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and SPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDSPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-27.38%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-11.90%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-15.18%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-27.38%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.70%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-7.72%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

3.82%

-2.27%

Volatility

RYLD vs. SPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 2.02%, while Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYLDSPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.35%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

8.60%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

13.22%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

16.04%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

15.98%

+1.22%

RYLD vs. SPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPD's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYLD vs. SPD - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, more than SPD's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.65%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
0.96%0.97%1.14%1.91%1.64%0.88%0.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYLD and SPD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPD has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to RYLD (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs SPD's -27.38%.

On 5-year performance, SPD leads with 8.36% vs 2.69% for RYLD. On fees, SPD is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPD has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPD is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.65%, compared with 0.96% for SPD.

RYLD is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SPD is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RYLD and 0.53% for SPD.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYLD and SPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer