PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. SPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYLD vs. SPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RYLD vs. SPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
1.10%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%14.05%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
-6.56%18.86%17.49%20.94%-25.96%24.81%8.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPD's -6.56% return.


RYLD

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
1.10%
6M
5.56%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
6.22%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*

SPD

1D
0.59%
1M
-5.51%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
19.07%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RYLD vs. SPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPD's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. SPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPD
SPD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLD vs. SPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYLDSPDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.81

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.68

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.64

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.78

5.36

-0.58

RYLD vs. SPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the SPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and SPD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYLDSPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.81

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.41

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.54

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and SPD is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RYLD vs. SPD - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.09%, more than SPD's 1.09% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.09%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
1.09%0.97%1.14%1.91%1.64%0.88%0.43%0.00%

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. SPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than SPD's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and SPD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDSPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-27.38%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-11.90%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-27.38%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-9.94%

+6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-7.87%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.65%

-1.11%

Volatility

RYLD vs. SPD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) at 3.33%. This indicates that RYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RYLDSPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

3.33%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

9.46%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

23.76%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

16.09%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

16.08%

+1.30%